About Me

Name: Red Patriot
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

The Un-Fairness Doctrine


The Fairness Doctrine designed to silence thousands of conservative voices on the airwaves is not meant to create a “fair and balanced” message by streaming in the liberal viewpoint alongside the conservative one, but rather to drown it out completely. This action is not only meant for just broadcasting but for the whole conservative movement whether it is in a church, a classroom, on a street, at a Tea Party or in congressional hearings.

The liberals are hell bent on getting their message accepted as the right, normal, decent and even American way to think and process our way of life in the United States and around the world. We have enjoyed a period of relative freedom that has come with some persecution and venom since President Reagan vetoed the legislation in 1987. In the words of President Clinton on February 13, 2009 on the Mario Solis Marich radio show, “Well, you either ought to have the Fairness Doctrine or we ought to have more balance on the other side, because essentially there's always been a lot of big money to support the right wing talk shows. Freedom of the press and freedom of speech was meant for just the liberals.

We have been on a downward spiral for a long time but as of recent the liberal movements of gay marriage and abortion on demand have attempted to eradicate the need for morality and belief in God. Here are a few rules we now have to accept as “Bible Truth” on the way to fair and balanced views in America:

Rules of the Un-Fairness Doctrine:

1. Never speak out on questionable actions of any liberal President especially the “Anointed One” or his Cabinet members or the now democrat Senate majority or you will be put on a DHS watch list as a right wing extremist otherwise known to liberals as Bible thumping, gun-clinging and homophobic psychos just for starters.

2. No Tea Parties ever. President Obama just doesn’t acknowledge them. They don’t exist and are a figment of our crackpot conservative imagination. Only 5 people are allowed to protest in front of former (but greater) President Bush’s ranch in Cranston, TX and that is a protest worth reporting about from every media outlet all over the world.


3. Schools can wholeheartedly embrace and endorse every Democratic candidate in their government classes, but those scary Republicans are going to make us all go to church and take away all our fun. Teaching about sex in health education at the age of 10 is okay, because every child at that age is eager to know how to put their first condom on a banana and pick out their first gay lover. And it’s important to talk about the Hindu goddess of wealth and fortune Lakshmi and October holiday Diwali, the September Muslim holiday Eid along with Kwanzaa and Hanukkah in the month of December and completely leave out Christmas because it’s the only religion that conflicts with the separation of church and state. Talking about other gods and religions is okay; just don’t bring up Jesus in December and April.

4. All pastors of real Bible believing churches need to embrace homosexuality as a valid lifestyle and not offend them if they come walking through their doors with why they need to be straight as Jesus was.

5. Tax cheats in the Cabinet are okay, but everyone else must pay their taxes.

6. Everyone must spread the wealth but Michelle Obama; she is going to cling to her $500 haute couture sneakers she wore to the soup kitchen. Michelle apparently doesn’t know how to share, poor thing!

7. We must love and accept all terrorists into our country and give them free reign to become productive members of their terrorist cells.

8. Water boarding and all other torture is really cruel and doesn’t work on terrorists. It just works on 24 when Jack Bauer does it.

9. Hollywood celebrities are wise old sages and they really have worked their way up to the top. We should respect them and their facelifts.

10. Liberals never lie and are not in denial. Borrowing money from China is a good thing. Our children’s children to the 4th generation paying off our current debt will promote a healthy and vibrant economy.

11. The liberal media is not biased and therefore does not need to present conservative views on their broadcasts.


12. We must apologize to every country that we have offended in protecting our country’s freedom, prosperity and sovereignty. After all we have never tried to help any of them in any way whatsoever.

13. Illegal aliens should be welcomed without any consequences because they will do the jobs the Americans won’t do. They also won’t pay their taxes and get free health care and schooling just for putting their toe across the border.

14. President Obama is not arrogant, we are. And he didn’t bow to the Saudi king. What were we thinking?

15. Michelle Obama is the prettiest and most hip First lady ever! Ever!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Torture Works on 24

While we have had years of discourse on the subject of torture as a means of obtaining information from reluctant spies, terrorists and other pond scum, Jack Bauer clearly answered the question last night, torture works. Had not the distraught President and the cynical senator been convinced that Jack would not be able to get exactly what he needed to know from the Senator’s staffer through violent treatment, the White House would have remained intact on last night’s episode of 24. The staffer was about to give crucial intelligence on the location of the attack when security blew down the doors where Bauer was interrogating him quite successfully with a stun gun. Last summer at the DNC, street theater by Jason Mattera demonstrated that there are people gullible enough to believe that detainees at Guantanamo have rights and deserve every convenience afforded to them be it cable TV or work out equipment . After some detainees were released from Guantanamo under the new Obama administration, at least one was accused of committing acts of subversion. Thanks President Obama for giving them the benefit of the doubt. What liberals don’t get is that terrorists are just that, terrorists. They have the bare minimum as far as rights are concerned. Getting a trip to Guantanamo is not some prestigious honor, it is a sign of certain suspicion. The truth is discovered not through talking by a candlelight dinner as our newbie president would like to think, but through rigorous torture and interrogation. That is the only way valuable information is ever obtained.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmedinajad the Loser

Ahmedinajad is a royal loser, but since he’s really not royalty, he’s just a loser.   He wants world control, to annihilate the Jews and the Christians and anything that gets in his way.  When Ayatollah Khomeini ousted the Shah of Iran, it was horrible.  But this is worse, and so unimaginable, that the United Nations has no idea what sort of madman they seem to praise within their walls.  I can’t believe now that I once wanted to be a translator for the UN.   Ahmedinajad along with Kim Jong- Il and Osama Bin Laden are more than capable of pushing the button to unleash a nuclear holocaust on the American people and our allies.  Heaven help us if Obama doesn’t see this and hopes  to sit down and talk with these crazed men.  What is rule one in any movie or law enforcement scenario when lives are at risk?  Do not negotiate with terrorists. Maybe Obama needs to catch up on some episodes of 24 in the White House theater and see how Jack Bauer deals with crazed men.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gitmo @ DNC goes waterboarding

Featured on Michelle Malkin's Hot Air blog was the outrageous street theater of Jason Mattera that really had me smiling!  Jason was talking to DNC attendees to get them to sign a petition for living improvements for Guantanamo detainees.  The incredible thing was they were agreeing to ESPN, MSNBC, Cinemax,Al-Jazeera, gift certificates and Jihad Olympics for these prisoners!  Jason kept on talking up the privileges more and more, and only maybe one in 7 said that it was not necessary.  Then he had a dance and wonderful conversation with a woman who demonstrated waterboarding on Youtube. She mentioned it was not accurate enough and wanted the people to make it look more authentic.  Jason asked her if she was being tortured since it was only a "practice" waterboarding, or if  US soldiers were being tortured during waterboard training.  Gotta love Jason!!! The woman looked puzzled.
 
Democrats believe in government handouts not only for the poor but also apparently for the imprisoned. Waterboarding though a tough interrogation technique, perhaps is not torture if used to gain information.  Perhaps it still is and we have to use it to get answers because being nice just doesn't work on men sworn to protect their country.  

 I wonder how soon Gitmo relief would come on Obama's agenda.
 

 And I
haven't seen Harold and Kumar's Escape from Guantanamo but I can only imagine.....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Torture Defined Part Two (copyright 2008 Red Patriot)

 
When it comes to the definition of torture to whom do we look?  How narrow or broad a definition do we entertain to reach an acceptable conclusion?

According to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, it is defined:

"any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions."[2]

The Third Geneva Convention states:

(Article 17): "No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind."

And how does the anti-torture group expect prisoners to give the interrogators vital information if they aren’t “coerced”?   Will a warm bath and 700 count sheets on a bed with a five course halal meal do the trick?  It is only when we think that our lives are in danger or when we are in excruciating pain that we will do just about anything to spare ourselves.  Torture is torture whether the law forbids it or not, defines it or not. These acts could be named anything else other than torture but these are proven interrogation techniques that work.

  And we have to use torture on the few so that millions of US citizens can live free from torture.  I have not heard of a POW being completely innocent and wrongfully tortured.  If a POW is captured, they tend to carry information helpful to the other side.  And if I am in error, let me know.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillarious!

 

I try not to laugh at the demise of others, but in this I must relish the manner in which Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken sore loser to a new low.  Yes it’s been a few weeks now since the reluctant concession but since she clung on for dear life for so long, I think it’s only fitting to take my sweet time in picking her apart piece by piece.

Her campaign discredited by tall tales of pregnant women turned away from hospitals while the baby died for lack of insurance were examples of scant information run amuck with liberal rant.  Didn’t she think that there were going to be fact checkers or did she think that her supporters had lobotomies before attending rallies?  Like they wouldn’t care since they were so enamored of her?  Americans had enough of the Clintons in the 1990’s why would they want seconds? Could we have called Bill Clinton “First Gentleman”?

She claims that she was a victim of feminism in her campaign.  Gloria Steinem and the like tried to explain that America wasn’t ready for a woman president.  But were they really ready for a Black man either?  If they were willing to endorse a Black man for president, then why not a white woman?  Surely in the American eye, a black man is the equivalent of a white woman when it comes to minority status and power?

Her flip flop views on the war must have been nurtured by John Kerry, while she was creating her platform based on the living Constitution blown back and forth by the winds of change, not the original meaning penned by our forefathers.

Her staff changed as quickly as her campaign stories did, and while she inflicted horror on them they in turn also continued the vicious cycle.  Toxic woman, toxic staff, toxic stories and toxic platform, why do we want her at the White House? We don’t want her and told her so, and it took her a long time to accept the answer.

In a moment of brief compassion though, I feel sorry for her family, her friends and her staff.  I feel sorry for her that she cannot get over herself or the fact that the world does not revolve around her.  God have mercy on her. 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whiplash! Copyright 2008 Red Patriot

 

No sooner did I post President Bush's support along with Senator McCain denouncing water boarding as torture did he turn right around and agree that water boarding was a necessary tool to win the war on terror.  Does your neck hurt as much as mine?  I wore a neck brace for almost a month.  I am assuming this change of heart was brought on by pressure from key people.  Or maybe he realized that he didn't want to appear as the weak-willed diplomat that sings to the tune of Live Aid or American Idol Gives Back.  No I hope not. 

 Winning in Iraq is a humanitarian effort equal to helping AIDS patients in Africa or Hurricane Katrina victims. It is reshaping the lives of the Iraqi people and setting up a democracy. It does require sacrifice and it is one that our troops have willingly accepted. It is preserving our way of life in America.

We support a fighting machine called the U.S. military.  Our intelligence community will use water boarding as deemed necessary and does not need to adhere to the U.S. Army Handbook on Interrogation techniques.  The Clandestine Service will and should use every method to smoke out the enemy.

I hope that our rough around the edges, not well spoken President continues to send a hard cold message to the world that we will not cower to threats or attacks made on the American people here or abroad.  We will win!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Torture Defined Part One

 

There has been much discussion on the difference between coercive interrogation and torture. President Bush recently retracted his original view on water boarding and, “accepted Sen. John McCain’s call for a law banning cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of foreign suspects in the war on terror.”  Associated Press (MSNBC)

Attorney General Michael Mukasey stated that water boarding could be regarded as torture if it were done to him.

“For everyone out there who has to have a definition, there it is," proclaimed [Stephen]Colbert. "Waterboarding is torture when it's done to Michael Mukasey. When it's done to everyone else, it is irresponsible to provide an answer." Mike Aivaz and Muriel Kane, Rawstory.com

Where do we find our definition of torture? Human rights groups would advocate that, “mildly coercive "stress" interrogation methods are clearly illegal and indistinguishable from torture.”  National Journal

Or shall we be emotionally swayed by the clear message given by the TV show “Law and Order SVU”? In the episode “Harm,” a white American woman was helping at a refugee center where she met a woman whose husband Abbas, was detained in Iraq and tortured (by Americans). He then fled to the U.S. (the country from where his interrogators came).  He was tortured again in the U.S. which led to a heart attack and subsequent death.  SVU detectives questioned the physician overseeing the torture and then she was brought to trial for negligent homicide. Toward the end of the episode they show “victims” of torture telling of their experiences. Would the U.S. military take prisoners without just cause or suspicion? 

Did we not lose some of the most beautiful buildings in New York City on September 11th along with thousands of lives that day? It turned out that this man Abbas who was tortured and died was the brother of a well known terrorist.   Pass the Kleenex please. Oh my, these people are being tortured. We should stop such senseless acts and let these people come to bomb and destroy our way of life.

We are fighting the war on terror, not trying to preserve our oil rights in the Middle East as the unhappy Americans known as liberals would like to think. It is obvious that September 11th proved to the world that we have enemies that would rejoice in the annihilation of the American people. Why wouldn’t we use every method available to extract information from these crazed men?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Waterboarding by Video

 
Where's the board in waterboarding? If you look at YouTube.com, you'll find some teens actually using a board for their victim while draping plastic over their face and then pouring water.  But that is not waterboarding.  The link below will give you a pretty accurate simulation while not causing permanent harm to the subject. Included is the subject's dilemma on his personal view of waterboarding: Is it coercive interrogation or torture?  You decide.  Will it be a useful tool in the hand of interrogators if other methods of "acceptable" interrogation have failed?  We have all seen war movies.  The last thing a POW will do is sell out his country or the people he works for. He will only reveal his name and serial rank.  These men are trained to withstand high levels of interrogation techniques. 
 
This video may be upsetting to some so you can click on the article and then decide if you want to see the simulation.
 
A little humor from Stephen Colbert on Waterboarding:
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama, oh boy!

Ever see a person have command of a group of people by their engaging stories?    If I were to tell the same story this same group people would say, "That's nice" and then walk away.  What makes this person so engaging?  It's the art of being fake.  Smokescreens with nice platitudes.  I don't play those games, I try to be honest and real.  It's the same with Obama and President Bush.  Why is everyone so in love with Obama?  Because he doesn't give concrete solutions but leads people on with flowery messages of hope.  People don't want to look at reality they want to hear happy stories.  Hillary Clinton can't turn on the charm like Obama so she cries after her 5 million dollar tear duct surgery infused into her campaign.  President Bush is a plain man who works hard and unfortunately is not a gifted speaker.  He's not good at answering off the cuff.  So people slaughter him.  Whenever people see blood they go for the kill.  And that is what is happening here.
 
I know someone like that.  They have gobs of friends and they let you know it.  They flaunt their "good will" and remind you all the while that you are nothing in comparison to them.  They show the entire world they are just so good and wonderful, but behind closed doors they sock it to you and chip away at you until you don't why you feel so bad but you do.   They even have most of their loved ones fooled. But not me. And I won't have to say one word, because like I have been saying lately, the truth will be revealed.  No I am not perfect, but I don't try to hide my mistakes.  Obama and former President Clinton have this same quality.  They are so charismatic, so poised, but behind closed doors they are destroying people. Thank God for Monica Lewinsky.  Obama is slowly being revealed as hot air.  Senator Kirk Watson anyone?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vindication is a Slow Process

Sometimes if there is a trail of failures and mistakes, it takes hard work to undo the damage.  President Bush is working under these conditions because of the apparent shortcomings of the war on terror. Perception of reality is distorted by our own opinions and biases.  When truth is hidden, it won't be for long.  When the next president comes into office, the current president's legacy will unfold.  Even when WMD's were found, people had already decided in their minds what to think of the war. 
 
Hurricane Katrina was considered by many a logistical nightmare because of the mismanaged resources going to New Orleans to a predominantly African American area.  Yet not as much coverage or attention went to Mississippi.  The squeaky wheel did get the grease in this situation.  Discrimination was the word that got the attention of the media and the world and made our President look like a fool.  No one tried to understand why resources weren't forthcoming, they pulled the race card.  The 9/11 commission was formed for similar reasons as well.  Again all a matter of perspective, and not actual truth. 
 
 Ten years ago my husband lost his job under false pretenses, based on the interpretation of a few.  But it was only a year ago that he was vindicated by a former colleague who told him that he was not to blame.  One lost job and and a townhome contract later we realize that people are going to think whatever they want to think no matter what the truth of a situation is.  I was blamed for a terrible family incident and now they tell me that it wasn't my fault, but out of it so much time has been lost.  People who are quick to assign blame will always continue to do so.  They don't want to look at the truth of the matter.  But truth will come out and appearances are just that. Nothing is as it seems. In fact they will listen to people with hidden agendas, those who have only their own personal interests at heart before they go to the source and examine for themselves the actual causes underlying a situation.
 
President Bush is doing his best to leave office with dignity while many are standing by booing and hissing at his performance. Others just look away and don't acknowledge the good that has been done.  Currently President Bush is making trips to visit leaders of other countries to spread goodwill.  Let's hope it is received in the manner in which it was given.  Still there are those who would distort his efforts and make a mockery of him.  Beware of people like those.  They have selfish motives and want nothing more than the spoils of hard work done by the few.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

George Bush, A Misunderstood President

  While many Republicans are rallying around Senator McCain as he seeks the presidential nomination (even though he may not be our first choice)  both parties are seething disgust (obviously more from the Democrats) about President Bush's legacy over the last 7 years.   We have left him lying in the proverbial gutter.

 Ann Coulter astutely observed at the CPAC a couple of weeks ago that Bush's legacy would be the prosecution of the war on terror.  Saddam is dead!!! Many top Al Qaeda leaders are captured!!!!  Vice President Cheney also said at this same conference that the lack of a terror attack the last 7 years is no accident it is an achievement. 
 
Tony Snow also said at CPAC that in addition to supporting our current president we need to take into account the "hand that he was dealt."  The 9/11 attack, Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, Hurricane Katrina all were a part of his lousy hand. President Clinton enjoyed an America not at war perhaps because former President Bush led a valiant war effort during his term.
 
There were also other factors that were not under his control, insurgents in Iraq and the response of a now Democrat led congress.  Could big government been the downfall of the people of New Orleans? Why didn't we rake President Clinton over the coals when the first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center happened in 1993?  Is it because President Clinton didn't fumble over words and played the sax?  Political popularity reveals unfortunate scapegoats.  I see no one pointing fingers at Congress's voting records. While the Democrats laud former President Clinton for his free ride for eight years, would he have handled the war on terror any better?

"Despite his rhetoric, Clinton made no changes in policy to prevent additional attacks, Johnson said.

"From the time President Clinton took office until May of 1995, a Presidential Decision Directive, PDD 39, sat in the National Security Council, in the In Box of one of the officials with no action taken. The significance of PDD 39 is that it was the document defining what the missions and roles were of combating terrorism," Johnson said.

"Despite what happened at the World Trade Center in 1993, the Clinton administration did not finally act on [PDD 39] until after the attack in Oklahoma City," Johnson said, referring to the 1995 attack in which an American, Timothy McVeigh, detonated a bomb outside the federal building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people."      -Taken from Matt Pyeatt, CNSNews.com, Thursday, Dec. 6, 2001 
 
 President Clinton left office smelling like a rose inspite of his very public scandal that got him impeached. It is the liberal media in part with its negative spotllight on President Bush that caused dissension in our GOP and many of us like scampered away like wimpering dogs. We all want a good man to stand behind, but we hid when he needed our support the most. Friends don't slink away in hard times; they come to the rescue!

In Vice President Cheney's address to the attendees of the VFW conference in 2002, he stated "there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us. And there is no doubt that his aggressive regional ambitions will lead him into future confrontations with his neighbors -- confrontations that will involve both the weapons he has today, and the ones he will continue to develop with his oil wealth." 
 
So when I think of President Bush's legacy, I will think of a man who did his best to win the war on terror, brought conservative judges into the Supreme Court, helped ease the tax monster and attempted the reform of Social Security.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The American Dream

Shantilal Nanji Satyabhashak was born in Baroda, India on February 19, 1931.  He was the son of an Indian Methodist pastor and one of nine children from two marriages.  His parents succumbed to sickness and died in the same month when he was six years old.  He was mostly raised by his brother Joseph and eventually went to live in hostels for schooling.  He told us stories of how he only had 2 outfits and 2 pairs of underpants that he had to wash frequently.  He laughed heartily as he spoke of some of his childhood memories. 

 

Eventually the time came for him to be married and an arrangement was made between the Satyabhashak and Canara families for Kathleen Canara to become his wife.  They married on May 15, 1958.  During the first few years of marriage, Shantu was the postmaster in Radhanpur and later Maninagar, India. He also completed a Bachelor’s degree in Economics at Maninagar College.  While my mother attended my grandfather's church on Sundays, you could find him playing cricket.  Perhaps that's why he fell in love with American baseball.  In 1962, their first child arrived.

 

In 1963 he left India and came to the United States on a student visa to pursue his master's degree.   He first arrived in Bangor, Maine to attend Husson College.  He was teased by his classmates for coming to a cold weather climate.  I guess Florida didn't have the program he was looking for.  From Maine he went to Fairleigh Dickenson University where he completed his M.B.A.

 

His wife and young daughter came to the states in 1967. They resided for a couple of years in Hoboken, New Jersey and then moved to Spanish Harlem six months after I was born. My brother came a year later.  He would spend all his time living there until 1999.

 

During our school years I remember frequent trips to Coney Island, the Bronx Zoo and Bear Mountain.  We would often drive up to Albany, New York and Burlington, VT to visit my sister at college.

 

Food was one of the ways I knew my Dad loved his kids.  In the morning he would cook us eggs, cream of wheat or oatmeal.  He would leave us snacks after school if he knew he wasn't going to be there.  Evenings we always had Indian food, and Tuesdays, American meatloaf. Even in his hospital stays over the last few years, he'd offer me his food making sure I had something to eat. 

 

 On special occasions we would either go out to eat in Chinatown or he would cook his delicious biryani.  My friends loved his biryani so much they learned to cook it.  He and my mother would spend hours making Indian sweets at Christmas and other holidays.  Kind of hard to make sweets as a diabetic, but I'm glad he did.  They’re now some of my treasured memories.  I also loved his keema and chicken curry in which he would throw some grated coconut on occasion. But I never got any real recipes from him.  It was always watching him cook and him telling me “use a little of this or a little of that.”  When visiting a local Afghani restaurant a year ago, I tasted their chole (chick peas) and remarked to my husband that they must have gotten the recipe from him. 

 

 He was openly passionate about his faith in God.  He found God in America.  It happened in a very Samuel-like experience.  In the Bible, Samuel was hearing someone call his name at night. Thinking it was Elkanah he went to him and Elkanah said it was not him but that instead that he should say, "Yes Lord."  I remember the countless hours we spent listening to my Dad preach at churches in Harlem, or the Haitian church in Brooklyn.  I can still hear the Creole translations in my mind. 

 

He had great plans and aspirations for his children and for himself.  He started working at Standard and Poor’s after he received his M.B.A.  He then worked for General Development in the 1980’s and became a real estate broker for commercial and private property in New York.  He became a citizen in 1982, another stepping stone in achieving his American dream.  He was a broker until his health started to fail in 1999.

 

My Dad tried to steer me toward computer programming.  After I received my B.A. in French and had been teaching for a while he recommended news broadcasting to me. My Dad knew that not only did I have an analytical side but a people side.  He used to call me his “Public Relations” person because of the hours I spent on the phone or with my best friend Lilly next door. 

 

He moved down to Virginia with my mother in 2000 so that it would be easier for us to take care of him.  And every day in Virginia he never let us forget that he had to get back to his promised land, New York City.  He also got to experience the joy of having two granddaughters and see his grown children settled in their lives and careers.  He also helped sponsor his two brothers and their families to come to the United States.

 

My Dad came to America worked, raised a family and made a life miles away from India.  He achieved his American dream.  Well done Daddy and Happy Birthday
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy SAINT Valentine's Day for tired couples

Let's face it, Valentine's Day has become nothing more than flowers, chocolate and either a dinner out or one at home, hopefully with a babysitter somewhere in the mix.  As I was standing in the checkout line getting the real Sudafed to help with our real sinus congestion, I saw men scurrying around getting flowers and candy for their beloved.  Or for those with larger budgets, a vacation, a car or diamond ring.   I hope that with those tokens of love come some heartfelt words.
 
But why just celebrate love a few days of the year on a birthday or an anniversary?  Romance is dead and lying on the street.  We need a resurrection of real love and romance that happens everyday.  So often the mundane gets in the way of the sublime.  We're so caught up in the details of life that we forget to work on the miracle of love that got us there in the first place.  The look of love that penetrates your heart.  The bending over backward gestures that just made you melt when you were dating. The giddiness every time you saw your sweetheart.  Let's go back to those days.
 
The origins of Saint Valentine's Day are varied but they all indicate that Saint Valentine gave up his life to stand up for faith and passion for God.  That's why he's called a saint and maybe we should put the "Saint' back into Valentine's Day.  Maybe remembering his story will move us to daily passion as well.
 
To read more on Saint Valentine's Day:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »