About Me

Name: Red Patriot
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Gitmo @ DNC goes waterboarding

Featured on Michelle Malkin's Hot Air blog was the outrageous street theater of Jason Mattera that really had me smiling!  Jason was talking to DNC attendees to get them to sign a petition for living improvements for Guantanamo detainees.  The incredible thing was they were agreeing to ESPN, MSNBC, Cinemax,Al-Jazeera, gift certificates and Jihad Olympics for these prisoners!  Jason kept on talking up the privileges more and more, and only maybe one in 7 said that it was not necessary.  Then he had a dance and wonderful conversation with a woman who demonstrated waterboarding on Youtube. She mentioned it was not accurate enough and wanted the people to make it look more authentic.  Jason asked her if she was being tortured since it was only a "practice" waterboarding, or if  US soldiers were being tortured during waterboard training.  Gotta love Jason!!! The woman looked puzzled.
 
Democrats believe in government handouts not only for the poor but also apparently for the imprisoned. Waterboarding though a tough interrogation technique, perhaps is not torture if used to gain information.  Perhaps it still is and we have to use it to get answers because being nice just doesn't work on men sworn to protect their country.  

 I wonder how soon Gitmo relief would come on Obama's agenda.
 

 And I
haven't seen Harold and Kumar's Escape from Guantanamo but I can only imagine.....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Torture Defined Part Two (copyright 2008 Red Patriot)

 
When it comes to the definition of torture to whom do we look?  How narrow or broad a definition do we entertain to reach an acceptable conclusion?

According to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, it is defined:

"any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions."[2]

The Third Geneva Convention states:

(Article 17): "No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind."

And how does the anti-torture group expect prisoners to give the interrogators vital information if they aren’t “coerced”?   Will a warm bath and 700 count sheets on a bed with a five course halal meal do the trick?  It is only when we think that our lives are in danger or when we are in excruciating pain that we will do just about anything to spare ourselves.  Torture is torture whether the law forbids it or not, defines it or not. These acts could be named anything else other than torture but these are proven interrogation techniques that work.

  And we have to use torture on the few so that millions of US citizens can live free from torture.  I have not heard of a POW being completely innocent and wrongfully tortured.  If a POW is captured, they tend to carry information helpful to the other side.  And if I am in error, let me know.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »